AI Writing Tools
Drafting, editing and rewriting tools for marketing copy, articles and email.
5 tools
- GrammarlyGrammar and tone checking that works everywhere you type.Official: grammarly.comfrom $12/mo
- Notion AIAI built into Notion, able to search and write across your existing workspace.Official: notion.com/product/aifrom $10/mo
- Copy.aiGo-to-market workflows that automate sales and marketing content.Official: copy.aifrom $49/mo
- JasperMarketing copy platform with brand voice controls for teams.Official: jasper.aifrom $39/mo
- Originality.aiAI detection and plagiarism checking aimed at publishers and agencies.Official: originality.aifrom $15/mo
Writing tools cover a wide span, from grammar checking that has existed for decades to systems that draft a whole article from a brief. The useful distinction is between tools that improve text you wrote and tools that produce text you did not — they carry very different risks, and the second kind is the reason search engines have spent the last two years learning to recognise generated prose.
What to look at when choosing
Editing your text is a different job from generating text
Grammar, clarity and tone tools work on something you already decided to say — low risk, immediate benefit, and the output still sounds like you. Draft generators start from a topic and invent the substance, which means they can invent facts too. Knowing which one you are buying prevents most of the disappointment in this category.
Does it keep your voice or replace it
The most common complaint about generated prose is not that it is wrong but that it is flat — even, agreeable and free of anything specific. Tools differ in how much they flatten. If the writing carries your name or your company's, look for one that works from your own material and preserves how you actually phrase things, rather than one that rewrites everything into the same register.
Anything factual still needs checking
Names, dates, figures, quotes and citations are exactly what these systems get confidently wrong. A tool that cites sources you can open is meaningfully safer than one that does not, but neither removes the need to verify. The failure mode is not obvious nonsense — it is a plausible, well-formed sentence that happens to be false.
When you probably do not need one
If the piece depends on your own experience, your data or your opinion, generating a draft is often slower than writing one: you spend the time you saved on correcting substance the tool could not know. Generation pays off on formulaic text — product descriptions, meeting summaries, first drafts of routine correspondence — where the shape is predictable and the facts come from you.
